Orange County Accountant

My friend owes the IRS and they are taking part of her disability check each month. Can this happen? If not, what can she do to stop it?

In california i work at ralphs
and i work 25 a week for 7.60
How much federal income tax, ssa tax, other taxes, and union fees will go out in total?
How much will i get back for income tax return?

I defaulted on my student loans on December 24 (Merry Christmas) and I was wondering if the IRS would garnish my tax return immediately? Or does it usually take a while for the IRS to flag you?

IRS tax debtIf you happened to be one of the unfortunate individuals to owe tax debt from your past years, or you have paid your taxes for the current year, and still expect to owe further taxes to the IRS in the form of IRS debt, it?s possible for you to find a solution to redeem your taxes. The actual solution lies in not ignoring to pay your debt. Even though the IRS can collect the taxes up to ten years, it possesses many other powerful options to recover, and chances are it will. If you have outstanding IRS tax debt, the best possible solution is to utilize your savings, or alternatively borrow some funds to clear the debt. By paying your entire outstanding dues, it?s possible to save upon the penalties and fines, which are likely to be levied in case you decide to avail more time and clear your taxes over a period of time. If one borrows against some asset value such as your home, it?s quite possible the interest incurred might be tax deductible. It?s also possible to avail tax relief if you can represent your case properly to the IRS.Tax attorney servicesSince last few years, tax attorneys, and the services offered by them have been in high demand, especially since the tax season is approaching soon. Many taxpayers are likely to need tax help. While selecting your representative to deal with your IRS issues and concerns, it is quite important to retain somebody who can represent you to the best of his or her abilities, and not have conflicts while representing your case to the IRS. Even though the tax attorneys can be quite knowledgeable, properly trained, and have the ability to handle your issues, it is found that they can lack in aggressiveness when it comes to representing you to the IRS. The thing is most agencies like to maintain good terms with the tax authorities, since their entire business is dependent upon special tax clients, helping out tax debtors in availing IRS debt help, and good market reputation. It?s sad that IRS often takes advantage of some timid and docile tax attorneys because it knows that firm prefer to keep a positive image, and IRS can well damage the reputation through propaganda.It?s generally believed that it?s expensive to retain a good tax attorney to avail IRS debt relief. At a first glance, the client might feel that the tax laws are simple to understand and straight forward. So they often feel they can communicate directly with the IRS and avail an acceptable situation. This could turn out to be a mistake, since IRS rules can be interpreted in many different ways, and IRS is an expert in that. So it?s recommended not to take any chances, and have an effective arbitration by employing the services of an experienced tax attorney to get effective tax debt settlement.

I heard from other people that they itemized all the receipts from groceries and other items that has taxes on them and they include this when they file their tax. They don’t own businesses so I don’t get how they can do this. Is there a separate form that I can fill out to include all my expenses that has taxes on them?

I recently became a Texas resident and paid sales tax to Texas on a car I purchased. Is that state sales tax deductable from my federal income taxes (Texas has no state income tax)?

1. Service tax authorities, of late, have been issuing notices to various borrowers of External Commercial Borrowings (ECB?s) from foreign branches of Indian banks and holding them liable to pay Service tax from September 10, 2004 under section 65(12)(a)(ix) of the Finance Act, 1994 which covers ECBs.

According to the borrower, the responsibility of paying service tax is of the service provider which is the foreign branch of the Indian bank and, hence, the Indian bank having a permanent establishment in India, is supposed to pay and not the borrower.

The contention of the service tax authorities is partially correct after coming into effect of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 from April 18, 2006.

Until the coming into effect of section 66A, the liability and obligation to pay service tax was that of Indian bank and not that of the borrower. Contrary to the contention of the service tax authorities, even under rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of the said Rules, effective from August 16, 2002 and June 16, 2005 respectively, the borrower cannot be made liable for the payment of service tax.

2. Rule 2(1)(d)(iv) reads as follows

?Person liable for paying the service tax? means,?

(iv) in relation to any taxable service provided or to be provided by a person, who has established a business or has a fixed establishment from which the service is provided or to be provided, or has his permanent address or usual place of residence, in a country other than India, and such service provider does not have any office in India, the person who receives such service and has his place of business, fixed establishment, permanent address or, as the case may be, usual place of residence, in India.?

From the aforesaid provisions, it would be clear that until April 18, 2006, the requirement under rule 2(1)(d)(iv) was that only in case where the service provider did not have any office in India, the person receiving taxable service was liable for paying service tax involved. In the cited case, the Indian Bank having its registered and head office in India, and a branch in a foreign country cannot be said to be a service provider who did not have an office in India.

After coming into effect of section 66A, rule 2(1)(d)(iv), substituted with effect from April 18, 2006 by the Service Tax (Second Amendment) Rules, 2006, reads as follows

??Person liable for paying the service tax? means –

(iv) in relation to any taxable service provided or to be provided by any person from a country other than India and received by any person in India under section 66A of the Act, the recipient of such service;?

As such, until April 17, 2006, the borrower was not a ?person liable for paying service tax? within the meaning of the Act and the said Rules, including rule 2(1)(d)(iv) thereof.

It is relevant to note herein that the phrase ?does not have any office in India?, in rule 2(1)(d)(iv), stands omitted from the substituted rule. As such, with effect from April 18, 2006, in any case where the taxable service is provided or is to be provided by either a person who has established a business in a country other than India or has a fixed establishment from which the service is provided or is to be provided in a country other than India or has his permanent place or usual place of residence in a country other than India, the service recipient in India would be treated as if it has itself provided the service in India and, accordingly, it would be liable to pay the service tax and comply with all procedural and other requirements as specified in the Act and the said Rules. The respective clauses in section 66A (1) (a) are disjunctive and, hence, once any of the three alternatives contained therein are satisfied, the service recipient becomes liable to pay service tax on the taxable service involved.

Applying the aforesaid provision, since the service is being provided by foreign branch of an Indian Bank, the condition precedent laid down in section 66A(1)(a) is satisfied and, in the absence of the phrase ?does not have any office in India? in rule 2(1)(d)(iv), as recipient of the services, the borrowers would be liable to make payment of the service tax payable on the ?Banking and Other Financial Services?.

3. The fees paid or to be paid are liable to service tax under ?Banking and Other Financial Services? under the Act with effect from September 10, 2004. The liability to pay service tax for the period prior to April 18, 2006 would be that of Indian Bank and on and from April 18, 2006, would be that of the borrowers.